Weather or not, it happens! |
Following is a brief
response from Dr. Patrick Frank, regarding the U.N.’s artsy fartsy brochure “Understanding
Climate Change: A Beginner's Guide…”
“Understanding Climate
Change: A Beginner's Guide…”
Published
by the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) and the Climate Change
1)
Scientists see a
real risk that the climate will change rapidly and dramatically over the coming
decades and centuries. Can we handle it?
Dr. Patrick Frank, responding to our friend Debbie B.’s question about the U.N.’s artsy fartsy 1997 brochure “Understanding Climate Change: A Beginner's Guide…”’
One needn't go
past “Problem number 1” to see problem number fatal.
Scientists
*don’t* "see a real risk that the climate will change rapidly and
dramatically” over any time frame.
They didn’t see that risk in 1997, and they don’t see it now.
The reason they don’t see a risk is that they can’t see anything about the future climate. Couldn’t see it then, and can’t see it now.
Climate physics isn’t developed enough. Climate models can’t predict anything.
None of those people know what they’re talking about (doesn’t stop them talking though).
When the premise is fatally wrong, no reason to read further.
They didn’t see that risk in 1997, and they don’t see it now.
The reason they don’t see a risk is that they can’t see anything about the future climate. Couldn’t see it then, and can’t see it now.
Climate physics isn’t developed enough. Climate models can’t predict anything.
None of those people know what they’re talking about (doesn’t stop them talking though).
When the premise is fatally wrong, no reason to read further.
Last year
Energy and Environment published my paper showing the crock that’s AGW
so-called science. It’s titled "Negligence, Non-Science, and Consensus
Climatology”
http://multi-science.atypon.com/doi/abs/10.1260/0958-305X.26.3.391
http://multi-science.atypon.com/doi/abs/10.1260/0958-305X.26.3.391
This shows
that climate modelers are not scientists:
http://wattsupwiththat.com/2015/02/24/are-climate-modelers-scientists/
This shows there’s no physical meaning in climate model projections:
http://wattsupwiththat.com/2015/05/20/do-climate-projections-have-any-physical-meaning/
http://wattsupwiththat.com/2015/02/24/are-climate-modelers-scientists/
This shows there’s no physical meaning in climate model projections:
http://wattsupwiththat.com/2015/05/20/do-climate-projections-have-any-physical-meaning/
Dr. Patrick
Frank is a physical methods experimental chemist on the scientific staff of the
Stanford Synchrotron Radiation Lightsource, SLAC, Stanford University. Apart
from professional work, his publications include critical assessments of the
science is philosophy myth, the noble savage myth, and the human-caused global
warming myth.
No comments:
Post a Comment