PROPERTY OWNERS - STOP OIL & GAS TAKINGS!
Print fill out and send Demand to Remove References
|Chuck Sylvester's signed and sent letter.|
Demand to Remove Reference of Private Property Rights from SB19-181
Attention: Colorado State Senator Stephen Fenberg and Colorado State Representative K.C. Becker
Please consider this my formal demand you remove references of my Private Property Rights from SB19-181 and honor the Fifth Amendment of the United States Constitution.
The Fifth Amendment of the United States Constitution provides that private property shall not be taken for public use without just compensation.Executive Order 12630 Governmental Actions and interference with Constitutionally Protected Property Rights reaffirms the protection of property rights. No law has extinguished these rights.
I, the undersigned, am the Owner of Private Property Rights (PPR) which may include deeded land, grazing allotments, certain permits, improvements, trademarks, agreements, animals, water shares, rights of way, easements, cattle trailways, gas oil and mineral, water/forage and other beneficial uses deemed legal, titled structures, airspace, business and residence located in the county(s) of _______________in the state of ___________..
It has been brought to my attention that legislation known as SB19-181 includes Owner’s PPR, and property not owned by me but are conjoining, in my community, county, and state, to the extent SB19-181 will harm PPR and my community, county and state’s economic stability.
SB19-181 Sponsors Colorado State Senator Stephen Fenberg and Colorado State Representative K.C. Becker failed to: a) Seek written consent or permission from Owner to include PPR. b) Review their actions carefully to prevent unnecessary takings. c) Include provision for Just Compensation. Therefore, Owner considers SB19-181 Sponsors as engaging in “takings without just compensation.”
SB19-181 has already harmed Owner by disturbing, violating and encumbering rightful usage, creating a financial burden, jeopardizing income and placing a cloud on PPR.
As Owner whose Private Property Rights are being harmed by SB19-181, please consider this my formal demand Sponsors remove any and all references of my PPR from SB19-181.
In keeping with State and Federal Constitutional rights to acquire, possess and protect my PPR, I, the undersigned as Owner, hereby require that upon receipt of my demand, Sponsors make public their record of immediate removal of any and all references of my Private Property Rights from SB19-181.
I, as Private Property Rights Owner, reserve the right to seek remedy appropriate and provided by law and may include malfeasance, should Sponsors fail to immediately remove my PPR from SB19-181 and honor the Fifth Amendment of the United States Constitution.Sincerely,
Attachment: EXECUTIVE ORDER 12630 of March 15, 1988
EXECUTIVE ORDER 12630 of March 15, 1988
(Published in the Federal Register Vol. 53, No. 53, Friday, March 18, 1988)
Governmental Actions and Interference With Constitutionally Protected Property Rights
By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and laws of the United States of America, and in order to ensure that government actions are undertaken on a well-reasoned basis with due regard for fiscal accountability, for the financial impact of the obligations imposed on the Federal government by the Just Compensation Clause of the Fifth Amendment, and for the Constitution, it is hereby ordered as follows:
Section 1. Purpose. (a) The Fifth Amendment of the United States Constitution provides that private property shall not be taken for public use without just compensation. Government historically has used the formal exercise of the power of eminent domain, which provides orderly processes for paying just compensation, to acquire private property for public use. Recent Supreme Court decisions, however, in affirming the fundamental protection of private property rights provided by the Fifth Amendment and in assessing the nature of governmental actions that have an impact on constitutionally protected property rights, have also reaffirmed that governmental actions that do not formally invoke the condemnation power, including regulations, may result in a taking for which compensation is required.
(b) Responsible fiscal management and fundamental principles of good government require that government decision-makers evaluate carefully the effect of their administrative, regulatory, and legislative actions on constitutionally protected property rights. Executive departments and agencies should review their actions carefully to prevent unnecessary takings and should account in decision-making for those takings that are necessitated by statutory mandate.
(c) The purpose of this Order is to assist Federal departments and agencies in undertaking such reviews and in proposing, planning, and implementing actions with due regard for the constitutional protections provided by the Fifth Amendment and to reduce the risk of undue or inadvertent burdens on the public fisc resulting from lawful government action. In furtherance of the purpose of this Order, the Attorney General shall, consistent with the principals stated herein and in consultation with the Executive departments and agencies, promulgate Guidelines for the Evaluation of Risk and Avoidance of Unanticipated Takings to which each Executive department or agency shall refer in making the evaluations required by this Order or in otherwise taking any action that is the subject of this Order. The Guidelines shall be promulgated no later than May 1, 1988, and shall be disseminated to all units of each Executive department and agency no later than July 1, 1988. The Attorney General shall, as necessary, update these guidelines to reflect fundamental changes in takings law occurring as a result of Supreme Court decisions.
Sec. 2. Definitions. For the purpose of this Order:
(a) "Policies that have takings implications" refers to Federal regulations, proposed Federal regulations, proposed Federal legislation, comments on proposed Federal legislation, or other Federal policy statements that, if implemented or enacted, could effect a taking, such as rules and regulations that propose or implement licensing, permitting, or other condition requirements or limitations on private property use, or that require dedications or exactions from owners of private property. "Policies that have takings implications" does not include:
1)Actions abolishing regulations, discontinuing governmental programs, or modifying regulations in a manner that lessens interference with the use of private property;
2)Actions taken with respect to properties held in trust by the United States or in preparation for or during treaty negotiations with foreign nations;
3) Law enforcement actions involving seizure for violations of law, of property for forfeiture or as evidence in criminal proceedings;
4) Studies or similar efforts or planning activities;
5)Communications between Federal agencies or departments and State or local land-use planning agencies regarding planned or proposed State or local actions regulating private property regardless of whether such communications are initiated by a Federal agency or department or are undertaken in response to an invitation by the State or local authority;
6)The placement of military facilities or military activities involving the use of Federal property alone; or
7)Any military or foreign affairs functions (including procurement functions thereunder) but not including the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers civil works program.
(b) Private property refers to all property protected by the Just Compensation Clause of the Fifth Amendment.
(c) "Actions" refers to proposed Federal regulations, proposed Federal legislation, comments on proposed Federal legislation, applications of Federal regulations to specific property, or Federal government actions physically invading or occupying private property, or other policy statements or actions related to Federal regulation or direct physical invasion or occupancy, but does not include:
(1) Actions in which the power of eminent domain is formally exercised;
(2) Actions taken with respect to properties held in trust by the United States or in preparation for or during treaty negotiations with foreign nations;
(3) Law enforcement actions involving seizure for violations of law, of property for forfeiture or as evidence in criminal proceedings;
(4) Studies or similar efforts or planning activities;
(5) Communications between Federal agencies or departments and State or local land-use planning agencies regarding planned or proposed State or local actions regulating private property regardless of whether such communications are initiated by a Federal agency or department or are undertaken in response to an invitation by the State or local authority;
(6) The placement of military facilities or military activities involving the use of Federal property alone; or
(7) Any military or foreign affairs functions (including procurement functions thereunder,) but not including the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers civil works program.
Sec. 3. General Principles. In formulating or implementing policies that have takings implications, each Executive department and agency shall be guided by the following general principles:
(a) Governmental officials should be sensitive to, anticipate, and account for, the obligations imposed by the Just Compensation Clause of the Fifth Amendment in planning and carrying out governmental actions so that they do not result in the imposition of unanticipated or undue additional burdens on the public fisc.
(b) Actions undertaken by governmental officials that result in a physical invasion that substantially affect its value or use, may constitute a taking of property. Further, governmental action may amount to a taking even though the action results in less than a complete deprivation of all use of value, or all separate and distinct interests in the same private property and even if action constituting a taking is temporary in nature.
(c) Governmental officials whose actions are taken specifically for purposes of protecting public health and safety are ordinarily given broader latitude in courts before their actions are considered to be takings. However, the mere assertion of a public health and safety purpose in insufficient to avoid a taking. Actions to which this Order applies asserted to be for the protection of public health and safety, therefore, should be undertaken only in response to real and substantial threats to public health and safety designed to advance significantly the health and safety purpose, and be no greater than necessary to achieve the health and safety purpose.
(d) While normal governmental processes do not ordinarily effect takings, undue delays in decision-making during which private property use if interfered with carry a risk of being held to be a takings. Additionally, a delay in processing may increase significantly the size of compensation due if a taking is later found to have occurred.
(e) The Just Compensation Clause is self-actuating, requiring that compensation be paid whenever governmental action results in a taking of private property regardless of whether the underlying authority for the action contemplated a taking or authorized the payment of compensation. Accordingly, governmental actions that may have a significant impact on the use or value of private property should be scrutinized to avoid undue or unplanned burdens on the public fisc.
Sec. 4 Department and Agency Action. In addition to the fundamental principles set forth in Section 3, Executive departments and agencies shall adhere, to the extent permitted by law, to the following criterias when implementing policies that have takings implications:
(a) When an Executive department or agency requires a private party to obtain a permit in order to undertake a specific use of, or action with respect to, private property, any conditions imposed on the granting of a permit shall:
(1) Serve the same purpose that would have been served by a prohibition of the use or action; and
(2)Substantially advance that purpose.
(b) When a proposed action would place a restriction on a use of private property, the restriction imposed on the use shall not be disproportionate to the extent to which the use contributes to the overall problem that the restriction is imposed to redress;
(c) When a proposed action involves a permitting process or any other decision-making process that will interfere with, or otherwise prohibit, the use of private property pending the completion of the process, the duration of the process shall be kept to the minimum necessary;
(d) Before undertaking any proposed action regulating private property use for the protection of public health or safety, the Executive department or agency involved shall, in internal deliberative documents and any submissions to the Director of the Office of Management and Budget that are required:
1)Identify clearly, with as much specificity as possible, the public health or safety risk created by the private property use that is the subject of the proposed action;
2)Establish that such proposed action substantially advances the purpose of protecting public health and safety against the specifically identified risk;
3)Establish to the extent possible that the restrictions imposed on the private property are not disproportionate to the antoinette to which the use contributes to the overall risk; and
4)Estimate to the extent possible, the potential cost to the government in the event that a court later determines that the action constituted a taking. In instances in which there is an immediate threat to health and safety that constitutes an emergency requiring immediate response, this analysis may be done upon completion of the emergency action.
5)Executive Department and Agency Implementation.
a)The head of each Executive department and agency shall designate an official to be responsible for ensuring compliance with this Order with respect to the actions of that department or agency.
b) Executive departments and agencies shall, to the extent permitted by law, identify the takings implications of proposed regulatory actions and address the merits of those actions in light of the identified takings implications, if any, in all required submissions made to the Office of Management and Budget. Significant takings implications should also be identified and discussed in notices of proposed rule-making and messages transmitting legislative proposals to the Congress, stating the departments' and agencies' conclusions on the takings issue.
c)Executive departments and agencies shall identify each existing Federal rule and regulation against which a takings award has been made or against which a takings claim is pending including the amount of each claim or award. A "takings" award has been made or a "takings" claim pending if the award was made, or the pending claim brought, pursuant to the Just Compensation Clause of the Fifth Amendment. An itemized compilation of all such awards made in Fiscal Years 1985, 1986, and 1987 and all such pending claims shall be submitted to the Director, Office of Management and Budget, on or before May 16, 1988.
(d) Each Executive department and agency shall submit annually to the Director, Office of Management and Budget, and to the Attorney General an itemized compilation of all awards of just compensation earned against the United States for takings, including awards of interest as well as monies paid pursuant to the provisions of the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970, 42 U.S.C. 4601.
(e)(1) The Director, Office of Management and Budget, and the Attorney General shall each, to the extent permitted by law, take action to ensure that the policies of the Executive departments and agencies are consistent with the principles, criteria, and requirements stated in Sections 1 through 5 of this Order, and the Office of Management and Budget shall take action to ensure that all takings awards levied against agencies are properly accounted for in agency budget submissions.
(2) In addition to guidelines required by Section 1 of this Order, the Attorney General shall, in consultation with each Executive department and agency to which this Order applies, promulgate such supplemental guidelines as may be appropriate to the specific obligations of that department or agency.
Sec. 6. Judicial Review. This Order is intended only to improve internal management of the Executive branch and is not intended to create any right or benefit, substantive or procedural, enforceable at law by any party against the United States, its agencies, its officers, or any person.
THE WHITE HOUSE
March 15, 1988